hi
Q1) is 1st bar of starting point located at 1st of sequece ?? right ??
Q2) if [ distance, price, bar index]
      starting bar:[0, 9, '2'],
      nearest bar: [4, 7, '5']
      
      what bar is on more high probability ??  starting bar or 2nd bar(=nearest bar)..

at now , bot is not responding of my privmsg as PRIVMSG Daneel :.challenge_xor_ocr start.
plz. check.

Edit   --> now server well working..
thanks for good challs.

Postez ici vos messages.

is that chall just solve the minesweeper as find the mines? or pwnable or crack ??
edit   --> i solved.. thanks for good chall

may i ask one thing??   what that mean ?

tell the bot on THIS chan (not in private message, on the #clef_xor chan) ".challenge_xor_ocr <la_chaîne_de_caracteres>" .. 
 ====> not PRIVMSG but NOTICE right??    i tried both. but failed. hmm. i read all the threads. ***I**.   i joined the chan. i tell the both right answer. but. failed..     if that spoiling, i would erase that.

thanks regards..

Salut
ta syntaxe est mauvaise

Code:

reponse = { "rep1":"F" , "rep2": 8 , "rep3":13 , "rep4": 41 , "rep5": 789456123789456123}

tu devrais avoir ceci :

Code:

reponse = { 'rep1' : 'F' , 'rep2' : '8' , 'rep3' : '13' , 'rep4' : '41' , 'rep5' : '789456123789456123'}

Relis les posts précédents, tu auras sûrement des réponses à ta question de login.
Tu sembles être proche de la solution

You don't have to. i tried both. and both are successful.

and . i found the cause of time consuming.  at first, i send the cookie, headers etc by making them by myself. but that makes time waiting....  so i used the session of requests module . finally so fast...  that works..... passed.
thanks for nice challs.
regards.

thanks for reply from the lsd.

i checked the 2nd pro. processing time. hmm. about 2-3 sec . so the total time is over 2 sec.
BTW, i red the forum.  i found the strange or important stuff. ie  HTTP connection can be done..
but i tried that. but like other user as kasmax, 301 moved to http://HTTPS://www.....  so the output is "Renvoyez <strong>tous</strong> les  résultats à  l'aide du formulaire."   i append the content type, content length host etc..  previously i successed by the HTTPS.. so is that really possibily to use HTTP connection rather than HTTPS??

thanks

regards.

thanks to rostale's reply.

and after on, the processing of 1st submit maybe corrected.  not "too low" reply is there.
but still after submit of login and pass, still too slow is there.  i got the correct login and pass and correctly submit the data..

in the chall, * NB:The login and the pass are only valid for 2 seconds, don't waste time.. so total 4 sec is valuable for users from the 1st page get to the end submit of id and password ??  right ?? or total 2 sec ???

hmmm. still stuck.

who teach me??

thanks regards.  all free corona 19..

J'avais un peu laissé tomber le défi pour un temps (raisons professionnelles).
Intrigué par ta proposition de syntaxe (il me semblait qu'en python le " était le strict équivalent de ') je tente et finis par trouver mon erreur:
Dans mon code j'avais écrit "rep2 " à la place de "rep2"   
Sinon pas besoin non plus de passer mes entiers en strings, j'ai testé les 2 et ça passe.
Merci à vous deux pour le coup de main ( je découvre wireshark en parallèle mais je ne peux prétendre avoir tout bien compris pour l'instant... ).

Plus que l'étape 3 maintenant.

may i ask what mean " write "rep2" instead of "rep2" ????? is that same each others??

hi.  i send the right anagram. the reply is Trop lent!..  i send the wrong anagram . the replay is "wrong response"  
i tested the processing the time of the anagramming.. about 0.002 ~ 0.001etc seconds.. not very long within 1sec.
the time lapse of POST anagram is abut 1.2 sec.. hmmm
hmm.   i used python 3.

where i was wrong ? here is south korea

thanks. all free CORONA 19
regards.